

View previous topic :: View next topic 
Author 
Message 
Liam Guest

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 15:01 Post subject: 


The formula is right, I tried it. 

Back to top 


Locutus Guest

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:01 Post subject: 


Here are the formulas, stated somewhat more clearly:
P := current population
G := expected population growth
D := planet diameter
R := racial bonus (from 0.6 to 1.6)
T := tax rate (from 0 to 0.15)
L := leisure park  1 if leisure park is built, 0 otherwise
G = 0.1 * ( 30D  P ) * R * ( 0.1 + 0.03*L  T )
Mathy people will notice that P(t) is just an exponential function, asymptotically approaching the maximum size. However, due to roundoff error, it will probably never actually reach the maximum size
Edit: corrected formula
Last edited by Locutus on Sun Apr 20, 2008 07:58; edited 1 time in total 

Back to top 


Aurion Guest

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 13:21 Post subject: 


Why did you revive this thread, after two long years?
Btw, it is one of the oldest threads here, look at the post date of the initial post.
And the part with never reaching the calculated maximum is true, but it gets really close, so you will not miss it that much. 

Back to top 


Locutus Guest

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:16 Post subject: 


I revived it because I needed to check some of the formulas for a program that I'm writing... I made the post because I thought that the formulas were very vague about the bounds of the variables (whether to use 1.6 or 160 for the racial bonus, for example.) 

Back to top 


alphabravo Major
Joined: 15 Feb 2004 Posts: 827 Location: UK

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 16:19 Post subject: 


it varies from 60% to 160%, which, in a numerical form, is 0.6 to 1.6 _________________ Major alphabravo in the house ThalgadosSissyhood 

Back to top 


Locutus Guest

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 21:51 Post subject: 


Also, the original post did not make very clear how exactly tax was incorporated into the formula:
Quote:  growth factor = race factor / 100 (for 0% tax, each percent tax reduces the growth by 10%, a leisure park increases by 30%) 
versus:
Quote:  G = 0.01 * ( 30D  P ) * R * ( 0.1 + 0.03*L  T ) 
Some may think my revival of this thread is unnecessary, but I think my formula is somewhat more clear than the other one. Either way, it doesn't hurt anything. 

Back to top 


Aurion Guest

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 04:49 Post subject: 


Hey, no offense meant. Just wondering that you chose an two year old thread.
If i would deem your post not appropriate, i would have told you right away.
It is good that some players tend to make their knowlegde available for the public. 

Back to top 


BlackSkull Guest

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 07:28 Post subject: 


Locutus wrote:  Also, the original post did not make very clear how exactly tax was incorporated into the formula:
Quote:  growth factor = race factor / 100 (for 0% tax, each percent tax reduces the growth by 10%, a leisure park increases by 30%) 
versus:
Quote:  G = 0.01 * ( 30D  P ) * R * ( 0.1 + 0.03*L  T ) 
Some may think my revival of this thread is unnecessary, but I think my formula is somewhat more clear than the other one. Either way, it doesn't hurt anything. 
This formula is still wrong.
My Testplanet have a Diameter of 49586 km, with a Population of 1486652 Insectoids (R= 1.4). The Planet have a leisurepark.
G = 0.01 * (30*49589  1486652) * 1.4 * (0.1 + 0.03  0.15)
G = 0.01 * (1018) * 1.4 * (0.02)
G = 10.18 * 1.4 * 0.02
G = 0.28504 ~ 0 (round and cut set the return to 0)
BUT : The G in real was 2 and not 0.
Second Testplanet :
45767 km Diameter, 1372727 Morphoids (1.6), 14 % tax, Leisure Park
0 Grow
G = 0.01 * (30*45767  1372727) * 1.6 * (0.1 + 0.03  0.14)
G = 0.01 * (283) * 1.6 * (0.1)
G = 0.4528 ~ 0
The Real G was 0 too.
Its a riddle 

Back to top 


Locutus Guest

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 08:04 Post subject: 


BlackSkull wrote: 
My Testplanet have a Diameter of 49586 km, with a Population of 1486652 Insectoids (R= 1.4). The Planet have a leisurepark.
G = 0.01 * (30*49589  1486652) * 1.4 * (0.1 + 0.03  0.15)
G = 0.01 * (1018) * 1.4 * (0.02)
G = 10.18 * 1.4 * 0.02
G = 0.28504 ~ 0 (round and cut set the return to 0)
BUT : The G in real was 2 and not 0.
Second Testplanet :
45767 km Diameter, 1372727 Morphoids (1.6), 14 % tax, Leisure Park
0 Grow
G = 0.01 * (30*45767  1372727) * 1.6 * (0.1 + 0.03  0.14)
G = 0.01 * (283) * 1.6 * (0.1)
G = 0.4528 ~ 0
The Real G was 0 too.
Its a riddle 
It turns out that both of us made errors  my formula was wrong, but it should be correct now. I had swapped a 0.1 instead of 0.01 at the beginning.
On your first planet, this should give you 2.6 which should round down to 3, but somehow does not. Check with http://www.kosmor.de/download/wachstum.swf
Also, on your first planet, you used 49589 for planet size instead of 49586. Either way, you are expected to have 3 growth, but somehow you only got 2.
On your second planet, you used the now correct formula instead of the one I had originally posted, which is why it worked correctly.
As for the 2/3 error on the first planet, I have noticed slight rounding errors on some of my planets  for example:
Size: 37708 km
Population: 1078293
Tax: 9%
Race: 1.6 (morphoid)
Leisure park: yes
G = 0.1 * (30*37708  1078293) * 1.6 * (0.1 + 0.03  0.09)
G = 338.9 > 339
http://www.kosmor.de/download/wachstum.swf agrees with my formula, but in Kosmor, I had 340 growth. 

Back to top 


alphabravo Major
Joined: 15 Feb 2004 Posts: 827 Location: UK

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 05:45 Post subject: 


I'm almost certain that only the integer parts of growth or negative growth are taken.
Therefore
12.1 => 12
12.8 => 12
2.1 => 2
2.8 => 2 _________________ Major alphabravo in the house ThalgadosSissyhood 

Back to top 




You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
